Dorsal approach in laparoscopic extended left hemi-hepatectomy: A case series.

RATIONALE: The utility of the dorsal approach has been reported for laparoscopic left hemi-hepatectomy. PATIENT CONCERNS: The aim of the present study is to show the usefulness of the dorsal approach for laparoscopic extended left-hemi-hepatectomy while ensuring safe identification of hepatic veins and dissection of the dorsal tumor margin. DIAGNOSES: Tumors requiring extended left hemi-hepatectomy. INTERVENTIONS: After mobilization of the lateral sector and division of the Arantius plate, parenchyma above the Arantius plate is removed to expose the root of the middle hepatic vein and left hepatic vein. Each of these veins can be isolated separately either intra- or extra-hepatically. After removing the parenchyma on the cranial side of the left Glissonean pedicle continuous with the exposed hepatic veins, the left Glissonean pedicle is isolated using the Glissonean pedicle transection method. After division of the left hepatic vein and Glissonean pedicle, segment 4 (in which the main part of the tumor is commonly located) is dissected from the anterior plane of the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe by the dorsal approach, along with the hepatic hilum. Following dissection of the dorsal side of the tumor, and division of parenchyma from the anterior edge of the liver, the anterior Glissonean branches and middle hepatic vein are divided safely and the specimen is resected. OUTCOMES: Three patients underwent laparoscopic extended left hemi-hepatectomy, with no open conversions. Operative time and blood loss were 331 (concomitant with another partial hepatectomy), 277, and 315 minutes; and 200, 100, and 100 g, respectively. The postoperative courses were uneventful. LESSONS: The dorsal approach maximizes the advantages of laparoscopic extended left hemi-hepatectomy and can be performed safely.

Double hepatic vein reconstruction during extended anatomical resection of segment 8 for colorectal liver metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic vein reconstruction (HVR) is occasionally necessary for resecting hepatic malignancies to ensure surgical margins while preserving remnant liver function [1]. Reports of multiple HVR are rare due to the highly technical demanding procedure and high risk of morbidity [2]. We introduce our procedure of double HVR for metastatic liver tumors invading the right hepatic vein (RHV) and middle hepatic vein (MHV). METHODS: The patient was a 66-year-old man with colorectal liver metastasis in segment 8, invading RHV and MHV. Due to impaired liver function, extended right hemihepatectomy was unsuitable. Thus, extended anatomical resection of segment 8 with double HVR was performed. The liver was completely mobilized and the RHV and MHV were secured. After liver parenchyma dissection, the specimen was connected by RHV and MHV (Fig. 1). The MHV was dissected and reconstructed using a right superficial femoral vein graft while the RHV remained connected [3]. Reconstruction of the MHV was performed on the posterior wall of the proximal side, followed by the anterior wall, using 4-point supporting threads. Anastomosis was performed by the over-and-over suture method. On the distal side, two-point supporting threads were applied. After specimen removal, the RHV was resected and reconstructed in the same manner using a left internal jugular vein graft [4]. RESULTS: The patient was discharged on postoperative day 14 with no signs of liver failure. Computed tomography performed six months after surgery revealed no graft occlusion (Fig. 2). CONCLUSION: In appropriately selected patients, this technique may be a useful option for preserving the remnant liver function.

A patient alive without disease 32 months after conversion surgery following lenvatinib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor thrombus originating in the middle hepatic vein and reaching the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava: a case report.

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma appears to be increasing in incidence since the advent of new molecular target drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, reports on long-term outcomes are limited and the prognostic relevance of this treatment strategy remains unclear. Herein, we report the case of a 75-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma, 108 mm in diameter, accompanied by a tumor thrombus in the middle hepatic vein that extended to the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava. He underwent conversion surgery after preceding lenvatinib treatment and is alive without disease 51 months after the commencement of treatment and 32 months after surgery. Just before conversion surgery, after 19 months of lenvatinib treatment, the main tumor had reduced in size to 72 mm in diameter, the tip of the tumor thrombus had receded back to the suprahepatic vena cava, and the tumor thrombus vascularity was markedly reduced. The operative procedure was an extended left hepatectomy with concomitant middle hepatic vein resection. The tumor thrombus was removed under total vascular exclusion via incision of the root of the middle hepatic vein. Histopathological examination revealed that more than half of the liver tumor and the tumor thrombus were necrotic.

Laparoscopic Liver Tunnel for Tumors at the Hepatocaval Confluence.

BACKGROUND: Tumors at the hepatocaval confluence can be treated with parenchyma-sparing surgery, also with minimally invasive approach.1,2 The "Liver Tunnel" was described for tumors involving the paracaval portion of Sg1 in contact or infiltrating the middle hepatic vein (MHV).3 A "Liver Tunnel" with laparoscopic approach is proposed. METHODS: A 48-year-old woman was referred for three synchronous colorectal liver metastases in the paracaval portion of Sg1 in contact with the inferior vena cava and the MHV, in Sg8 ventral and in Sg6, after an urgent left laparoscopic hemicolectomy for an obstructing carcinoma. A laparoscopic Sg1 resection extended to Sg8 ventral were planned after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Estimated future liver remnant (FLR) was 75% (840 ml) of healthy liver (Fig. 1). In case of right hepatectomy extended to Sg1, estimated FLR was 25% (280 ml) of healthy liver. Fig. 1 3D reconstruction and intraoperative images of Liver Tunnel (A) and Sg6 resection (B). Total liver volume: 1110 ml. Total resected liver volume 270 ml: Liver Tunnel 93 ml; Sg6 177 ml. Liver volumes were measured with HA3D™ technology with Medics3D software (Medics3D, Turin, Italy) RESULTS: Pneumoperitoneum is established, and four operative ports are placed. Sg1 is approached from the left, dividing the Glissonean pedicles and short hepatic veins. MHV is approached cranio-caudally from the dorsal side. The resection continues on the ventral side, according to our "Ultrasound Liver Map technique" with a cranio-caudal approach to the MHV.4 Sg8 ventral pedicles are divided and the resection completed with aid of indocyanine green negative staining. A Sg6 resection is then performed. Operative time was 480 min. Blood loss was 100 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on fourth postoperative day. The two parenchyma-sparing resections saved an estimated volume of 75% (840 ml) of healthy liver (Fig. 1). The estimated remnant liver volume after a right hepatectomy extended to Sg1 would have been only 25%. CONCLUSIONS: Tumors at the hepatocaval confluence involving Sg1 can be removed with the "Liver Tunnel," which can be performed with minimally invasive approach. The "Laparoscopic Liver Tunnel" pushes further the limit of minimally invasive parenchyma-sparing surgery for ill-located tumors with complex vascular relationship.

Pure Laparoscopic Anatomic Resection of Liver Segment 4 with Middle Hepatic Vein Involvement Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Staining.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic anatomic resection of liver segment 4 is a technically challenging operation, which is rarely reported owing to the difficulty of defining the demarcation of a hepatic segment 4 on a monitor.1 The portal territory staining method is technically feasible to identify tumors and segment boundaries during hepatectomy.2 Herein, we describe the laparoscopic hepatectomy of segment 4 using the fluorescent-positive staining method. METHODS: A 72-year-old man recurred colorectal liver metastases after colectomy, positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) showed metastases located in segment 4 with involvement of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) and caudate lobe; no other organ metastasis or recurrence occurred. We performed an anatomical hepatectomy 4 with MHV and parenchymal resection of segment 1 (H1'/4-MHV).3 The key point of the procedure was dividing and clamping Glisson's branches for segment 2 and segment 3 using the hepatic round ligament approach; the G2 and G3 were dissected along the right side of round ligament via the extrahepatic Glissonian approach, then the left hepatic artery (LHA) was divided and injected with ICG in the left portal vein (LPV). Finally, transection was performed along the fluorescent stain location line and ischemic demarcation line. RESULTS: The operation time was 263 min; the Pringle lasted 110 min, and the estimated blood loss was 400 g. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 without complications. Sigmoid carcinoma and R0 margin were confirmed by histopathology. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy 4 with middle hepatic vein invasion using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence staining is a feasible and effective technique.

Buddi-Chiari syndrome associated with hypereosinophilic syndrome: A case report.

RATIONALE: Budd-Chiari Syndrome (BCS) is a relatively rare clinical disorder with a wide range of symptoms, caused by the obstruction of the hepatic venous outflow. The etiology and pathogenesis of BCS vary in different countries and regions. In Western countries, hepatic venous obstruction is the most common type, and its main cause is closely related to the hypercoagulable state of the body. Inferior vena cava obstruction is common in Asia, and its etiology progresses slowly due to the lack of epidemiological data. [3] Here, we report a rare case of BCS associated with the hypereosinophilic syndrome and discuss the possible causal relationship between the two. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient was a 33-year-old female with intermittent epistaxis, gum bleeding, and excessive menstrual flow for the past 6 months. The routine blood tests showed elevated levels of eosinophils, and the liver function test showed mildly elevated levels of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase and alkaline phosphatase, and abdominal ultrasound showed hepatosplenomegaly and suspicion of intrahepatic arteriovenous or arteriovenous-portal fistula. DIAGNOSES: Finally, through the improvement of bone marrow aspiration, digital subtraction angiography and gene detection, the diagnosis of BCS combined with hypereosinophilic syndrome was confirmed, and JAK2V617F mutation was highly associated with it. INTERVENTIONS: The patient received endovascular stent implantation and regular oral rivaroxaban anticoagulation therapy after operation. OUTCOMES: Seven months later, enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the hepatobiliary showed that the hepatic bruise-like changes were significantly reduced compared with before, and the right hepatic vein and the right perihepatic vein stent were left in place with a good filling of contrast in the stent. LESSONS: The patient, in this case, was finally diagnosed with BCS combined with hypereosinophilic syndrome, and to our knowledge, such case reports are rare. Our case report suggest an association between BCS and hypereosinophilic syndrome, but relevant studies are minimal, we hope to conduct larger and higher quality studies on these patients in the future, to provide new directions and basis for the etiology and pathogenesis of these diseases, as well as provide new targets and ideas for clinical treatment.

Microanatomical organization of hepatic venous lymphatic system in humans.

Lymphatic fluid drains from the liver via the periportal lymphatic, hepatic venous lymphatic, and superficial lymphatic systems. We performed a postmortem study to clarify the three-dimensional structure and flow dynamics of the human hepatic venous lymphatic system, as it still remains unclear. Livers were excised whole from three human cadavers, injected with India ink, and sliced into 1-cm sections from which veins were harvested. The distribution of lymphatic vessels was observed in 5 µm sections immunostained for lymphatic and vascular markers (podoplanin and CD31, respectively) using light microscopy. Continuity and density of lymphatic vessel distribution were assessed in en-face whole-mount preparations of veins using stereomicroscopy. The structure of the external hepatic vein wall was assessed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The lymphatic dynamics study suggested that lymphatic fluid flows through an extravascular pathway around the central and sublobular veins. A lymphatic vessel network originates in the wall of sublobular veins, with a diameter greater than 110 µm, and the peripheral portions of hepatic veins and continues to the inferior vena cava. The density distribution of lymphatic vessels is smallest in the peripheral portion of the hepatic vein (0.03%) and increases to the proximal portion (0.22%, p = 0.012) and the main trunk (1.01%, p < 0.001), correlating positively with increasing hepatic vein diameter (Rs = 0.67, p < 0.001). We revealed the three-dimensional structure of the human hepatic venous lymphatic system. The results could improve the understanding of lymphatic physiology and liver pathology.

Upper Transversal Hepatectomy with Two Hepatic Veins Reconstruction: Combining Parenchymal-Sparing Liver Surgery with Transplantation Techniques for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) involving two or three main hepatic veins pose a surgical challenge. For these lesions, compelled surgical strategies have usually included major and/or extended liver resections according to the two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) strategy. More recently, a one-stage transversal hepatectomy resecting the posterosuperior liver segment (7,8,4 superior) along with one or more hepatic veins has been described, such as showed herein in a didactical video. METHODS: The patient is a 78-year-old woman with two large CRLMs located into segment 2 and into segment 8. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography showed tumour stability after chemotherapy. The lesion of segment 2 is close to the left hepatic vein while the lesion of segment 8 infiltrates the middle (MHV) and the right hepatic veins (RHV). RESULTS: Under intermittent pedicular clamping, resection of the segment 7, 8, 4 superior along with the right and middle hepatic veins is performed. Reconstruction of the veins was performed with 2 cryopreserved autologous saphenous grafts. Postoperative course was uneventful and postoperative CT scan showed patency of the two venous graft reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for CRLM has evolved over the last two decades shifting from large anatomical resections to parenchymal-sparing resections. Sparing liver parenchyma allows surgical radicality while reducing the risk of liver failure and allowing repeated liver resection. Associating vascular reconstruction to parenchymal-sparing surgery reduces the risk of venous congestion of the spared liver parenchyma.

Simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization is better than portal embolization or ALPPS for hypertrophy of future liver remnant before major hepatectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is the Achilles' heel of hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. The most commonly used procedure to generate hypertrophy of the functional liver remnant (FLR) is portal vein embolization (PVE), which does not always lead to successful hypertrophy. Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) has been proposed to overcome the limitations of PVE. Liver venous deprivation (LVD), a technique that includes simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization, has also been proposed as an alternative to ALPPS. The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review as the first network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of the three regenerative techniques. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search for literature was conducted using the electronic databases Embase, PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar and Cochrane. RESULTS: The time to operation was significantly shorter in the ALPPS cohort than in the PVE and LVD cohorts by 27 and 22 days, respectively. Intraoperative parameters of blood loss and the Pringle maneuver demonstrated non-significant differences between the PVE and LVD cohorts. There was evidence of a significantly higher FLR hypertrophy rate in the ALPPS cohort when compared to the PVE cohort, but non-significant differences were observed when compared to the LVD cohort. Notably, the LVD cohort demonstrated a significantly better FLR/body weight (BW) ratio compared to both the ALPPS and PVE cohorts. Both the PVE and LVD cohorts demonstrated significantly lower major morbidity rates compared to the ALPPS cohort. The LVD cohort also demonstrated a significantly lower 90-day mortality rate compared to both the PVE and ALPPS cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: LVD in adequately selected patients may induce adequate and profound FLR hypertrophy before major hepatectomy. Present evidence demonstrated significantly lower major morbidity and mortality rates in the LVD cohort than in the ALPPS and PVE cohorts.

Extreme In Situ Liver Surgery Under Total Vascular Exclusion with Right Hepatic Vein and Inferior Vena Cava Grafts for an Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

In this multimedia article, we demonstrate an extreme in situ liver surgery under total vascular exclusion with right hepatic vein and inferior vena cava grafts for an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a centre with experience in highly complex hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplantation. This surgical approach after neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides an opportunity for surgical salvage in patients with large tumors invading the hepatocaval confluence. This patient was considered unresectable at another hospital and referred to our unit. We performed an accurate preoperative assessment with new generation 3D modelling to plan the type of vascular reconstruction that would allow adequate hepatic venous outflow and the volume of the future liver remnant sufficient to avoid postoperative liver failure. For hemodynamic management of the patient, we performed a total hepatic vascular exclusion with veno-venous bypass without intraoperative adverse events. We used a cryopreserved carotid artery graft after previously planning the most appropriate diameter and length for right hepatic vein reconstruction. The inferior vena cava was reconstructed with gore-tex graft. During the hospital stay there were no postoperative complications. The patient is free of disease. We conclude that patients with advanced malignant liver disease should always be referred to highly specialized liver surgery centers to assess the most appropriate oncological management and the possibility of surgical resectability.

Complications in hepatic vein catheterisation and transjugular liver biopsy.

INTRODUCTION: Portal pressure predicts the occurrence of decompensations in cirrhosis. Portal pressure is primarily measured via hepatic vein catheterisation (HVC), to which a transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) may be added. Indications for HVC are mainly therapy control and prognosis. TJLB is performed when a percutaneous liver biopsy is contraindicated or for other diagnostic reasons. Both procedures have reported low complication rates. The aim of this study was to identify indications and 30-day postprocedural complications. METHODS: Based on procedure codes, a list was generated in the report database compromising procedures from 1 January 2018 to 31 January 2022. Procedures were identified in electronic charts (Cosmic Arkiv). A total of 209 patients undergoing 277 procedures were included. Information regarding indications, complications, age, sex, diagnosis, comorbidity and blood tests was also analysed. RESULTS: The more frequently reported indications for HVC were control of betablockers and diagnosis. Indications for TJLB were diagnostic and research purposes. Complications after HVC included pain and transient supraventricular arrythmias. Four major complications after TJLB were found, which led to admission due to various causes of bleeding. CONCLUSION: HVC and TJLB are safe procedures. The complication rate for HVC and TJLB was 3.3% and 6.8%, respectively. Complications were minor; only four major complications after TJLB were found - none of which were mortal. FUNDING: None. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.

Revisión Anatómica de Sistema Venoso Intrahepático. Hematoma Intrahepático Subcapsular en Colecistectomia Laparoscópica / Anatomical Review of Intrahepatic Venous System. Subcapsular Intrahepatic Hematoma In Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

La aparición del hematoma intrahepático subcapsular (SHI) después de la colecistectomía laparoscópica es una complicación poco frecuente. El estudio anatómico de las venas suprahepáticas nos permitió observar que existen numerosos patrones de ramificación de estos. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 37 años que, durante la intervención de colecistectomía laparoscópica, se observa en el acto quirúrgico, la formación espontánea de hematomas subcapsulares, secundario a la tracción forzada del fondo del órgano

The appearance of subcapsular intrahepatic hematoma (SHI) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is an infrequent complication.The anatomical study of the suprahepatic veins allowed us to observe that there are numerous branching patterns of these. We present the case of a 37-year-old female who, during the laparoscopic cholecystectomy intervention, is observed in the surgical act, the spontaneous formation of subcapsular hematomas, secondary to forced traction of the fundus of the organ

Dragon 1 Protocol Manuscript: Training, Accreditation, Implementation and Safety Evaluation of Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization (PVE/HVE) to Accelerate Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Hypertrophy.

STUDY PURPOSE: The DRAGON 1 trial aims to assess training, implementation, safety and feasibility of combined portal- and hepatic-vein embolization (PVE/HVE) to accelerate future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with borderline resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. METHODS: The DRAGON 1 trial is a worldwide multicenter prospective single arm trial. The primary endpoint is a composite of the safety of PVE/HVE, 90-day mortality, and one year accrual monitoring of each participating center. Secondary endpoints include: feasibility of resection, the used PVE and HVE techniques, FLR-hypertrophy, liver function (subset of centers), overall survival, and disease-free survival. All complications after the PVE/HVE procedure are documented. Liver volumes will be measured at week 1 and if applicable at week 3 and 6 after PVE/HVE and follow-up visits will be held at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the resection. RESULTS: Not applicable. CONCLUSION: DRAGON 1 is a prospective trial to assess the safety and feasibility of PVE/HVE. Participating study centers will be trained, and procedures standardized using Work Instructions (WI) to prepare for the DRAGON 2 randomized controlled trial. Outcomes should reveal the accrual potential of centers, safety profile of combined PVE/HVE and the effect of FLR-hypertrophy induction by PVE/HVE in patients with CRLM and a small FLR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04272931 (February 17, 2020). Toestingonline.nl: NL71535.068.19 (September 20, 2019).

Liver Venous Deprivation (LVD) Versus Portal Vein Embolization (PVE) Alone Prior to Extended Hepatectomy: A Matched Pair Analysis.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether liver venous deprivation (LVD) as simultaneous, portal vein (PVE) and right hepatic vein embolization offers advantages in terms of hypertrophy induction before extended hepatectomy in non-cirrhotic liver. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2018 and August 2019, 20 patients were recruited for a prospective, non-randomized study to investigate the efficacy of LVD. After screening of 134 patients treated using PVE alone from January 2015 to August 2019, 14 directly matched pairs regarding tumor entity (cholangiocarcinoma, CC and colorectal carcinoma, CRC) and hypertrophy time (defined as time from embolization to follow-up imaging) were identified. In both treatment groups, the same experienced reader (> 5 years experience) performed imaging-based measurement of the volumes of liver segments of the future liver remnant (FLR) prior to embolization and after the standard clinical hypertrophy interval (~ 30 days), before surgery. Percentage growth of segments was calculated and compared. RESULTS: After matched follow-up periods (mean of 30.5 days), there were no statistically significant differences in relative hypertrophy of FLRs. Mean ± standard deviation relative hypertrophy rates for LVD/PVE were 59 ± 29.6%/54.1 ± 27.6% (p = 0.637) for segments II + III and 48.2 ± 22.2%/44.9 ± 28.9% (p = 0.719) for segments II-IV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LVD had no significant advantages over the standard method (PVE alone) in terms of hypertrophy induction of the FLR before extended hepatectomy in this study population.

Left renal vein graft and in situ hepatic perfusion in hepatectomy for complete tumor invasion of hepatic veins: hemodynamic optimization and surgical technique.

PURPOSE: Assessing hepatic vein reconstruction using a left renal vein graft and in situ hypothermic liver perfusion in an extended liver resection. METHODS: Patients included in this study were those with liver tumors undergoing curative surgery with resection and reconstruction of hepatic veins. Hepatic vein was reconstructed using a left renal vein graft. We describe the technical aspects of liver resection and vascular reconstruction, the key aspects of hemodynamic management, and the use of in situ hypothermic liver preservations during liver transection (prior to and during vascular clamping). RESULTS: The right hepatic vein was reconstructed with a median left renal venal graft length of 4.5 cm (IQR, 3.1-5.2). Creatinine levels remained within normal limits in the immediate postoperative phase and during follow-up. Median blood loss was 500 ml (IQR, 300-1500) and in situ perfusion with cold ischemia was 67 min (IQR, 60.5-77.5). The grafts remained patent during the follow-up with no signs of thrombosis. No major postoperative complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Left renal vein graft for the reconstruction of a hepatic vein and in situ hypothermic liver perfusion are feasible during extended liver resection.

Pure Laparoscopic Right Upper Transversal Hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: First proposed by Torzilli et al.,1 the right upper transversal hepatectomy (RUTH) was one of the most complex techniques of parenchymal-sparing hepatectomies. Moreover, this operation is technically challenging, and studies were limited to case series.2-4 Nevertheless, this complicated procedure has not been reported to perform laparoscopically. We present a video of pure laparoscopic RUTH. METHODS: A 36-year-old female with HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was admitted to our institution. Abdominal CT showed a 5.5- × 5.0-cm mass located in deep S7-8 with involvement of middle hepatic vein (MHV) and right hepatic vein (RHV). Extended right hepatectomy was not adopted because of the insufficient volume of residual liver. Moreover, a thick inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV) and two communicating veins (CVs) were observed by preoperative 3-D reconstruction. Thus, laparoscopic RUTH was performed. RESULTS: After fully mobilization of right liver, the RHV and MHV were isolated and encircled. Then, intraoperative ultrasound was used to locate the tumor and identify the tumor-bearing portal territories. Subsequently, parenchymal transection was performed using the Harmonic. The Pringle's maneuver was used intermittently during transection as necessary (total Pringle time was 62 min). Four tumor-bearing portal pedicles were all confirmed and divided with the guidance of intraoperative ultrasound. The MHV and RHV were transected using the stapler and the IRHV was well preserved. Finally, the operation was finished and the color of residual liver was acceptable. The operative time was 240 min and estimated blood loss was 100 cc. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on postoperative Day 6. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic RUTH is technically feasible and safe in selected patients with IRHV and CVs.

Upper transversal hepatectomy with double hepatic vein resection and reconstruction to treat colorectal cancer liver metastases at the hepatocaval confluence: a strategy to achieve R0 liver-sparing resection.

BACKGROUND: Repeated hepatectomies in the therapeutic route of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) may improve their long term survival. Hepatic vein (HV) resection and reconstruction allows parenchyma-sparing hepatectomy (PSH) and R0 resections for CRLM in contact with one HV. We aimed at verifying the feasibility of PSH with double HV resection and direct reconstruction for CRLM in contact with two HVs at the hepatocaval confluence. METHODS: Out of 106 consecutive PSH performed for CRLM deep-located in segments I-IVa-VII-VIII, four (3.7%) PSH were performed with resection of CRLM en bloc with two adjacent HVs which were both reconstructed with double direct HV anastomosis: 3 cases between right-HV and middle-HV and 1 case between middle-HV and left-HV. Two patients had previously undergone liver resection. Three patients had one single lesion and one had 5 CRLMs. RESULTS: Median size of CRLMs in contact with HVs was 25 mm (range 22-30 mm). At histological examination, all resections were R0 except one R1-vascular (detachment from glissonean pedicle): in all cases at least one HV and in 1 case both HVs were infiltrated by the tumor cells. After median follow-up of 18 (range 3.5-41.2) months, all HVs were patent. All patients were alive and in good general conditions, and 3 patients were disease free (one of them following a liver re-resection). One patient experienced a grade IIIa complication. Median hospital-stay was 11 (range 9-13) days. CONCLUSION: In patients with CRLMs involving two adjacent HVs at the hepatocaval confluence, liver resection with double HV resection and direct reconstruction is feasible and may be considered to guarantee oncological radicality (R0) and spare health parenchyma.

Triphase contrast-enhanced CT to evaluate indications for autologous liver transplantation in patients with end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis.

Autologous liver transplantation (ALT) to cure end-stage hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (HAE) requires that hepatobiliary surgeons understand the invasion of intrahepatic structure and adjacent tissues or organs. Triphase contrast-enhanced CT of the liver has been widely used for diagnosis and preoperative evaluation of HAE. Three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction allows for accurate measurement of remnant liver volume (RLV). The objective of the study was to evaluate value of triphase contrast-enhanced CT together with 3D reconstruction in preoperative evaluation of indications for ALT in patients with end-stage HAE. This cohort include twenty-one consecutive patients with end-stage HAE, who preoperatively underwent triphase enhanced CT together with 3D reconstruction for ALT. To depict the indications, the 2D image data were reviewed statistically focusing on porta hepatis invasion, retrohepatic vena cava (RHVC) involvement and degrees of intrahepatic vessel invasion, and the 3D reconstruction was performed to obtain ratio of RLV to standard liver volume (SLV). The results showed that 95.24% patients (20/21) had porta hepatis invasion. When lesions located in right liver lobe, porta hepatis invasion occurred most commonly in the second and third porta hepatis (7/10), whereas the first, second and third porta hepatis were most commonly invaded by lesions in the right and caudate / left medial liver lobes (7/11) (P < 0.05). The mean value of longitudinal invasion of RHVC was 8.0 cm, and 95.2% (20/21) of patients had RHVC invasion with ≥ 180° circumferential invasion. As for the important vascular events, moderate and severe invasion occurred most commonly in the right hepatic vein, right branch of portal vein and RHVC each in 95.2% (20/21) patients (P < 0.05). We also found that preoperative CT had a good agreement with intraoperative findings in assessing intrahepatic vascular involvement by HAE (kappa index = 0.77). The estimated average ratio of RLV to SLV was 0.95 (range, 0.43-1.62). In conclusion, the 2D contrast-enhanced CT could well depict anatomic location and size of HAE, and invasion of porta hepatis and vascular by this disease, and involvement of other adjacent organs and tissues. Above all, 3D reconstruction could accurately measure RLV in patients with end-stage HAE for ALT.

Feasible laparoscopic left trisectionectomy by Arantius' ligament approach (with video).

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic trisectionectomy is a technically challenging procedure with high rate of postoperative morbidity [1,2]. Arantius' ligament approach is useful to expose the root of middle hepatic vein, which is required in left trisectionectomy [3]. METHODS: This video illustrates laparoscopic left trisectionectomy using Arantius' ligament approach. A 63-year-old man, with chronic kidney disease, had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with a diameter of 8 cm, located in the segment 4 and anterior section of the liver. The tumor was close to the umbilical portion of the left portal vein and future liver remnant was 770 ml (49.5% of the whole liver) after left trisectionectomy. VIDEO: After the pneumoperitoneum and the mobilization of the left lateral segment, the root of left and middle hepatic vein was exposed by division of Arantius' ligament and parenchymal transection of dorsal surface around the root of left hepatic vein. Next, the left Glissonian pedicle was controlled and divided. The Glissonean pedicle for the anterior section was then isolated and divided. Demarcation line was then observed using indocyanine green negative counterstaining. Parenchymal transection was completed followed by the division of the common trunk of the left and middle hepatic veins. RESULTS: The operation time was 294 min, and the blood loss was 400 g. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 16 after conservative treatment for temporary kidney injury. Pathological examination revealed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with negative surgical margin. CONCLUSION: The Arantius' ligament approach could be a feasible procedure for left trisectionectomy.